The Arizona Desert Lamp

ASUA: “We have no idea what the hell is going on.”

Posted in Campus, Politics by Evan Lisull on 18 February 2009

Idiocracy Screenshot

All that being said, Mr. Bergan gets some priceless quotes from your highly esteemed representatives. To wit:

Even if the Elections Commission thought a candidate might be violating a code, there is no guarantee it will be looked into, Anderson said.

“The Elections Commission doesn’t look for violations. They respond to violations,” she said. “There’s a point where it comes down to common sense.”

Surely it was “common sense” when Ms. Tubbs was docked for her unlicensed cookie distribution and an unauthorized Instant Message status — how dare she! And it certainly was common sense when the Administrative Vice President position had no listed candidate, until Sen. Ziccarelli suddenly, as if by an occult hand, acquired enough signatures between the deadline for filing and her currently listed status as a full candidate. Move along now – nothing to see here!

“We don’t want to see less people going out for ASUA,” she said. “We need to take the lessons learned from each election.”

Anderson said she believes no ASUA officials have violated the Elections Code.

Bruce, Anderson and Ho all echoed the sentiment that the rule is not clear-cut and comes back to the commissioner’s discretion.

Despite code-naming Facebook groups as online campaign material and Martinez’s assertion that the groups count as material that must be removed following elections, the trio says the rule is murky at best and open to interpretation. [Emphasis added – EML]

Rule of law is so twentieth century; instead, “smooth elections” are preferred to “free,” “fair,” “impartial” elections:


The Elections Commission retains the right to take all necessary steps to ensure the
smooth running[*] of the ASUA Elections.

I’m a bit slow on the uptake of these things, so bear with me. If an elections commissioner holds a grudge against a certain candidate (impossible, since all of our elections commissioners are angels gracing this earth; play along with me here), what is there to stop said commissioner from essentially ending this candidate’s run? In other words, is there any check on the Commissioner, or are we all just pawns in his/her “murky” game? Are we just hoping that the good will of the commissioner will save us?

If this code was so “murky”, then why was it described in opposite terms when the Senate voted unanimously to approve it? If the Code was still indistinct, shouldn’t it have been sent back to the drawing board, instead of being approved in record-setting time?

Bergan saves the best for last, with this gem from Sen. Jason Mighdoll:

Mighdoll said he will consider removing his 2008 campaign Facebook group.

“I didn’t know there was that rule (until) about a week afterward,” he said. “It gets complicated.”

Let me state this in no uncertain terms: You voted to pass this Code. You approved it, every last deplorable clause of it. To plead ignorance after the fact is to admit that, upon casting your vote, you had no idea what exactly you were doing. To admit so casts doubt on your entire record. If a mere 14 page document is too much to handle, what’s to say that a simple appropriation can be properly reasoned through? A resolution?

*- Now, if we had only had a “cool running,” that would be an election, mon.

Image via a Creative Commons license, from this post


10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] most circumstances, ‘common sense’ would seem to indicate that Mr. Nagata – by writing a public letter declaring that, “If […]

  2. […] most circumstances, ‘common sense’ would seem to indicate that Mr. Nagata – by writing a public letter declaring that, “If […]

  3. […] enough that the item was tabled, so that Senators can review the changes as carefully as they reviewed the Elections Code. Tagged with: ASUA, ASUA Senate, Mexico, PIRG, Spring Break « […]

  4. […] smart guys. They do a bunch of great work, especially lately, acting as the watchdog of campus affairs – ASUA, the looming budget cuts in Arizona, and everything related. I often don’t agree, but […]

  5. […] Elections in Action. Elections at the UA, as we all know, are not run by the rule of law but by diktat. Today, the Commissioner was fortunate enough to share one with us, concerning the referendum […]

  6. […] electioneering on the part of interested gamblers. But it’s not like we’re dealing with free elections anyways; we might as well have a little fun in the […]

  7. […] way of understanding what students want: paying off future debt for decades, higher tuition, and “murky” elections codes. Martinez has an even funnier way of understanding himself. Only a year ago, during the debate over […]

  8. […] a concept is incomprehensible – literally – to President Bruce and EVP Anderson, who are both prize-winning marketing majors. In the course […]

  9. […] – can be a government alone. When government becomes not about its laws, but about its rulers (Local Exhibit A), it is a reckless force – hence, the need for checks on the various aspects of authority. This […]

  10. […] up in the Wildcat, and the Senate quickly moved to change their group names, lamely offering the excuse that these groups could not be removed (lame not in the sense that it isn’t true, but that […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: